American Medical Association (AMA); Ethical practice in isolation, quarantine & contact tracing
"Contact tracing and isolation or quarantine of sick or exposed individuals are among the most effective tools to reduce transmission of infectious disease. Yet like many public health activities it raises concerns about appropriately balancing individual rights, notably privacy and confidentiality, with protecting the health of the community. The AMA Code of Medical Ethics provides guidance to help physicians strike this balance when they act in a public health capacity.
Opinion 8.11, “Health promotion and preventive care,” provides that “physicians who work solely or primarily in a public health capacity should uphold accepted standards of medical professionalism by implementing policies that appropriately balance individual liberties with the social goals of public health policies.” That includes notifying public health authorities when physicians “notice patterns in patient health that may indicate a health risk for others.”
In keeping with Opinion 8.4, “Ethical use of quarantine & isolation,” physicians should also educate patients and the public about public health threats, potential harm to others and the benefits of quarantine and isolation, and should encourage voluntary adherence. Physicians should support mandatory measures when patients fail to adhere voluntarily."
This blog (started in 2010) identifies and explores management and leadership-related topics. My Bloomsbury book "Ethics, Information, and Technology" will be published on January 8, 2026; preorders are available via this webpage: https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/ethics-information-and-technology-9781440856662/
Showing posts with label isolation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label isolation. Show all posts
Thursday, April 30, 2020
Sunday, July 31, 2016
Britain’s scientists are freaking out over Brexit; Washington Post, 7/31/16
William Booth and Karla Adam, Washington Post; Britain’s scientists are freaking out over Brexit:
"British research today is networked, expensive, competitive and global. Being part of a pan-European consortium has helped put Britain in the top handful of countries, based on the frequency of citations of its scientific papers. Last week the heads of British academic societies posted a public letter reminding everyone that the country’s universities, many of them among the best in the world, are staffed by legions of top-flight researchers from abroad... Research in the 21st century is more collaborative than ever, the scientists say... “You can’t do this kind of research in one country,” Rosser said. She is especially worried about what will happen to funding and collaboration for investigating rare diseases."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)